How can a person be declared disabled, but they can climb in a tree to hunt? How can a person be declared disabled because of seizure disorder, but obtain a drivers license?
Posts Tagged ‘Definition’
Definition Survey: Can the lovely members of P&S explain what this bumper sticker I saw this morning means?
16
Mar
“Squirrel Humper”
Should i have written down their license place and called the police so they could get gnabbed for animal cruelty?
What is the legal definition of a “non-permanent, non-fixed, above-ground pool” in the state of Florida?
10
Mar
In trying to start an above ground swimming pool installation company I have run across the problem that no one really knows what an above ground pool legaly is. I have found documentation that a pool contractors license is not required for the installation of a “non-permanent, non-fixed, above-ground pool” however when I provided my findings to the leon county licensing board I was asked exactly what a “non-permanent, non-fixed, above-ground pool” actially is. Can any one help?
Do a licensed professional (CPA), an exempt employee under the definition of labor law, gets compensated?
04
Mar
Do a licensed professional (CPA), an excempt employee under the definition of labor law, gets compesated for the overtime worked? I mean not the OT pay (150%), just the straight pay (100%). Where could I find thses information?
Isn’t getting a marriage license a “privilege” by definition?
25
Feb
If a marriage license is a grant of a privilege, why do people think that they don’t have a natural right to get married? A license is granted to do something that could be prevented by the licensor.
How can the state prevent two people from holding a private ceremony, and declaring themselves married in front of witnesses?
The only drawback is that it won’t be recognized by the state, correct?
Hi Lisa- if it’s a fundamental right, one does not need a license. How can one need permission to exercise a right?
Right on Stephen!
What Is The Legal Definition Of “work” Under California Law?
08
Feb
I have an employee who is trying to sue me for overtime hours and probably breaks. Without getting into the details, I have found substantial computer screen shot evidence that during her normal work hours she wasn’t “working” and in fact doing extensive personal stuff. I would like to argue, in part, that she wasn’t “working” and therefore not even entitled to the monies she already received (let alone additional monies). I am not asking for recovery of those monies just a squashing of the case. Is this a viable argument? What is the legal definition of “work” under California law?