Lec 6 | Mit 18.02 Multivariable Calculus, Fall 2007


Lecture 06: Velocity, acceleration; Kepler’s second law.

View the complete course at: http://ocw.mit.edu/18-02F07

License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
More information at http://ocw.mit.edu/terms…

Related Posts

Tags : , , , ,

Google Reader Yahoo Facebook Twitter Digg FriendFeed Delicious Google Translate
This entry was posted onFebruary 3rd, 2010 at 12:03 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Responses are currently closed, but you can Trackback..

10 Responses

Comments(10)Trackbacks(0)

  1. Angiegirl2112

    i understand all of this and im only 12

    February 3, 2010 12:38 am | #1
  2. rgh1986aka199

    Is anybody solving the assignment sets? I need help with Assignment 2> Problem 2….

    February 3, 2010 1:34 am | #2
  3. studentLifeProject

    Why isn’t the arc length from 0 to 2pi of the cycloid just the circumference of the wheel?

    February 3, 2010 2:19 am | #3
  4. michalchik

    Think of it this way. Let’s say the wheel did not turn but was simply dragged. The curve describing the path of a point on the wheel would be equal to the displacement of the wheel. Similarly, if the wheel did not move but simply turned in place the arc length would be 2pi for each revolution. The cycloid includes both the revolution and the translation as part of its length.

    February 3, 2010 2:31 am | #4
  5. studentLifeProject

    Thanks! That makes sense. Happy new year’s :)

    February 3, 2010 3:16 am | #5
  6. rgh1986aka199

    Points on the wheel do not have the same speed. Point of contact with the ground has 0 speed, the center has speed v, while the topmost point has speed 2v. By the time the centers moves some distance, the top point would have moved a greater distance. However if we fixate on a point on the rim, it will have variable speeds and would have covered various lengths in different time periods. The total length covered by one such point is arc length and it is more the circumference.

    February 3, 2010 4:00 am | #6
  7. brijeshagarwal1975

    for cycloid the proof was given in terms of angle,later it was told that at radius =1 and speed=unity, angle may be replaces with time.thus r vector of cycloid was arrived at in terms of t.also using this r in terms of t, speed was calculated as sqrt(2-2cost).my question is when relation in terms of t was arrived at by using speed =unity,why it is coming as sqrt(2-2cost) ?

    February 3, 2010 4:28 am | #7
  8. tharinduuuu

    @brijeshagarwal1975 in the first instance the speed at which the wheel moves to the right was set equal to 1(which was also set equal to the radius giving the magnitudes of angle and time equal to unity). The speed calculated afterwards was the velocity of the moving point P on the wheel which obviously varies with time. hope this helps.

    February 3, 2010 5:12 am | #8
  9. michalchik

    the angular speed of the wheel was set to 1. That is it completed on revolution in 2pi units of time. The speed we calculated was the linear speed of a point on the wheel.

    February 3, 2010 5:49 am | #9
  10. rgh1986aka199

    If the speed were non-unity say w, the relation would have come out to be root(2-2cos wt)…no biggie

    February 3, 2010 5:55 am | #10